Legal and Regulatory Analysis

The Rose Institute completes detailed analyses of complex legal questions among state, local, and tribal
governments, private businesses and public utilities. Rose Institute staff and students have worked
on projects that have addressed tribal sovereignty, the history and politics of the passage of the Indian
Gaming Regulatory Act, solid waste disposal, transportation, housing, the Endangered Species Act, and
water quality and availability. Studies typically incorporate the economic performance of each industry
as well as the regulatory environment in which each functions. The Rose Institute has also conducted extensive
research on constitutional issues, including the impact of a full-time legislature, redistricting and the
history of initiatives in California. Legal and regulatory projects often culminate in conferences designed
to further education on the topic.

Analysis of California v Cabazon Band of Mission Indians
Ralph A. Rossum, Ph.D., a leading constitutional law scholar and director of the Rose Institute, is currently completing a groundbreaking book on California v Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987), the Supreme Court case that enabled extensive Indian gaming. In Cabazon, the Supreme Court held that states are barred from interfering with tribal gaming – i.e., tribally sponsored, high stakes commercial gaming businesses operating in Indian country with a primarily non-Indian clientele. It held that states have no authority to enforce their gambling laws
on the reservations of federally-recognized tribes. While the Court had previously ruled that state laws
may be enforced on Indian reservations if Congress has expressly consented, it found in this case that
Congress had not consented to an assertion of state power either through Public Law 280 (1953), a federal
statute that delegated criminal/prohibitory but not civil/regulatory jurisdiction over Indian tribes in
California and five other states. In this forthcoming book, Dr. Rossum examines competing jurisprudential
approaches to tribal sovereignty, the relationship of tribes to the federal government and the states,
federal pre-emption analysis, and the proper approach to interpreting federal Indian law.

Tribal Gaming in California
This report examined the full impact of tribal gaming in California. Under
the terms of existing tribal compacts, California tribal governments typically pay as much to the states as
major public utilities pay to local governments. The study concluded that if California tribal governments
were treated as California corporations, then they would likely pay less than what they were paying at the
time.

Recent posts on Legal and Regulatory Analysis

The Weakness of California’s Congressional Redistricting Criteria

Posted 24 May 2010 | By Paul Jeffrey | Categories: CA Political History, Demographic Analysis, Legal Analysis, Redistricting, Rose Institute Archive & Database, Uncategorized | 3 Comments

In 2008, California voters adopted Proposition 11, a measure that stripped the state legislature of its power to draw its own districts and transferred that power to an independent redistricting commission.  Proposition 11 left in place the legislature’s power to draw the state’s congressional districts, but established new redistricting criteria for the legislature to follow [...]

Arkansas Court Strikes Down 2008 Initiative Prohibiting Cohabiting Couples from Adopting

Posted 23 May 2010 | By Paul Jeffrey | Categories: Legal Analysis | No Comments

An Arkansas trial judge recently struck down a 2008 initiative that prohibited cohabiting adults, not in a legally recognized marriage, from becoming adoptive or foster parents. In Cole v. Arkansas, Judge Christopher C. Piazza ruled that Initiated Act I, An Act Providing that an Individual Who is Cohabiting Outside of a Valid Marriage May Not [...]

Open Primaries in California: The Future of Proposition 14

Posted 11 March 2010 | By Ryan Wessels | Categories: Initiatives, Legal Analysis, Open Primary, Uncategorized | 6 Comments

In June 2010, California voters will have the chance to fundamentally alter the state’s primary election system. Currently, California operates under a modified closed primary system. Under this system, political parties nominate candidates for the November General Election through a June Primary Election. The primary is “closed” because voters may select only their own party’s candidates, [...]

Rose/Voice of San Diego “Out of Reach” articles joined

Posted 09 February 2010 | By Douglas M. Johnson, Consulting Fellow | Categories: About Rose Institute, Demographic Analysis, Fiscal Analysis, Legal Analysis, Rose Institute Authored, Rose Institute Cited | No Comments

Voice of San Diego, with whom the Rose Institute worked to put together our “Comparing San Diego County Services: A Twelve-County Analysis,” ran an insightful and comprehensive series of articles based on the Rose Institute study. The articles are all available from the Special Report center on the Voice website. And now Voice has put [...]

Rose releases report on San Diego County public services

Posted 01 February 2010 | By Douglas M. Johnson, Consulting Fellow | Categories: Demographic Analysis, Legal Analysis, Press | 1 Comment

The Rose Institute today released a report on the provision of services by San Diego County. Both the press release and the full report are now available online.
From the press release:
“The report comprehensively analyzes San Diego County spending and services in four categories: Welfare, Public Protection, Mental Health, and Other Public Assistance. Looking at the [...]